Spindle side showing the XL Z-axis assembly
Extruder side showing one of the smaller Z-axis assemblies with room for a second
Top view showing the build table size
So first off, this design is not finalized. I repeat, this design is not finalized. The biggest thing we need to work on is weight reduction on everything that is moving (X-axis, Z-axis assemblies, Y-axis carriage uprights, etc). All of these parts were modeled using the stock that we were going to make them from, but no weight reduction techniques were used. That is the single biggest challenge we will need to deal with, as currently we are trying to move about 80 pounds of metal using our 2 Y-axis motors. While this may be possible, it would be much more ideal to decrease this mass so that we can achieve higher acceleration and higher transverse speeds.
The main thing we were trying to do was to make a design that would be able to do both milling and high-speed prototyping. This requires great accuracy and strength as well as the ability for fast movements. We have specified some very fast multi-start leadscrews so we should be able to get some good speeds depending on the friction we encounter and how good a job I can do making the chopper motor drivers. In general, speed and accuracy work against each other so it has been quite a challenge to design a machine to work on both of these fronts.
More to come as we are hoping to have all the parts built by the end of the week!



I wouldn't really recommend your current setup for the Y-axis, because it's severely overconstrained. I think you'll find that it works fine in the CAD model, but not at all once you put it together...
ReplyDeleteWe thought about that, but if both motors are stepping at the exact same time, there should be no problems with binding, right? I have also seen this method used on several other smaller cnc machines so I assumed it was proven to work. If you have some first-hand experience, I would be very interested to hear it!
ReplyDeletewhy not use a belt?
ReplyDeleteThe mechanical advantage, accuracy improvements, and frame stability provided by leadscrews is significantly higher than that of a belt drive system. We analyzed about 5 different methods of movement (belt, rack and pinion, even a delta arm actually!) and the leadscrew was clearly the better choice for our application. Keep in mind that the Hydra will be doing some medium level milling as opposed to Mendel which is intended solely for prototyping. Milling through aluminum and PCBs at 20k rpm requires a pretty good amount of force and if you want to achieve any semblance of accuracy you need an extremely strong and rigid base. Leadscrews were an obvious choice after analyzing the key parameters from each method.
ReplyDeleteI love Hydra project!
ReplyDeleteWould you be so kind to post the 3d model as well?
Thanking you in advance,
Julyz